rise and fall

Posted November 9, 2014 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

Two books on radio, from two ends of its history.

“Hello Everybody,” by Anthony Rudel, is a history of the early rise of the medium. The bulk of the story is situated after the breakthroughs that led to radio, and ends, more or less, as Roosevelt takes office. As such, f.m. isn’t addressed at all, nor is a lot of time spent on technology in general. This is a social history of radio, what was said over the air and how and why it was important. Rudel writes about the role of baseball and boxing broadcasts, early forays in “news” and how it was mixed up with celebrity from the start, how entertainers and politicians figured out the best ways to use radio.

In his credits, Rudel acknowledges the work of a couple of newspaper reporters, for the New York Times and Washington Post, who had radio as their beat and who were writing every day. As such, there’s a deeply sourced quality to Rudel’s writing; one of the pleasures of the book is the tick-tock of major events.

As well, Rudel has the advantage of writing a history of radio – the book was published in 2008 – well into the internet age. He knows how connected we are now, and that informs his writing about how unconnected everything was back then. It’s as thrilling as any history of the early internet.

Want to know how the story ends? You could do worse than “Radio’s Digital Dilemma: Broadcasting In The 21st Century,” by journalist turned academic John Nathan Anderson. Anderson has specialized in an area of radio arcane to most people – the botched push since the 1990s to transition regular f.m.and a.m. to something called “HD” radio. You probably haven’t heard of it, because most people don’t have an HD radio or use one.

Anderson is a critic, but he’s also good with research and facts, and is careful to give all sides their due. The story he tells is that of a technology that promises much – it’s digital! it’s CD quality! it’s new channels for different audiences! – but struggles to deliver. Along the way, he meticulously documents how the drive for HD (which doesn’t stand for “high definition,” by the way) serves to give incumbent radio station owners, and especially large chains, even more of the broadcast spectrum than they had to start, while raising the bar to entry for anyone wanting to get into the business.

And while his story is focused on HD, by the time you’re through you can’t help but think he’s written a first draft of an obituary for radio in the 21st century. HD, as a way to keep audiences listening to “radio,” is already far back in a pack now dominated by audio delivered over the internet – traditional radio stations, “stations” that are internet-only and very often, a rich stew of programs that have radio as an ancestor, but are really becoming something else, something that will look back on things like HD and shake its head and wonder “What were they thinking?”

what i want from pandora

Posted November 6, 2014 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

I play around with a bunch of different streaming services, but find myself gravitating back to Pandora. I like the interface, the built-in stations and the very few I have started on my own. In some hard-to-put-a-finger-on-it way, it seems closer to real radio than the others.

Plus, there’s a client for Windows Phone, and a not bad at all third party program for Ubuntu.

But it’s not perfect, and I wish for a few things. If you stream off the desktop and pay for a subscription, the stream is 192 kbps, which I’m fine with. However, streaming through a device like a Squeezebox or a Sonos is  limited to 128kbps, subscriber or not. I’d like that increased.

The other thing I want is podcast integration of some sort. Stitcher set out to be the Pandora of spoken word audio and has done an admirable job, but I’d like it if Pandora would be the Pandora of the field. My guess is Pandora doesn’t because the audience is smaller, licensing is more complicated and figuring out how to do it without gumming up the interface is daunting, but still. I pay $4.99 a month now, and I’d add a dollar to the bill, maybe two, to get something like what I get from Stitcher.

Speaking of Stitcher, any time you guys want to do a Windows Phone app, my phone is waiting.

what i do with politicians

Posted September 7, 2014 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

I went to a press conference this week and asked a few questions. That in itself is unusual because I’m basically a news bureaucrat, the guy who signs time cards and looks at stories other, usually much younger, people write. But I went, because I hadn’t seen this politician in the flesh, and I wanted to.

Why I wanted to is what I want to note here, first noting that ‘why’ is not important at all to anyone but me. The questions and answers, and the context in which they took place, is what counts. This politician, and his counterpart in the other major party, have been taking some heat for not answering questions well or often or, in some cases, at all. We the press have solemnly noted that a political campaign is one long job interview, that answering our questions is what democracy is all about, that failure to do so is a Bad Thing. All of which is true, but doesn’t get to the heart of the matter.

So, at the press conference, with the candidate behind the podium in bright sunlight and a group of supporters flanking him, holding signs, I asked my questions. A few things: when you ask in that situation, in public, it’s always theater. Your role may be to be the reporter-who-doesn’t-care-about-the-theater-of-it, but it’s always there just the same, and when you ask you’re by definition performing. I know this, and I had a weird case of the jitters; I couldn’t figure out where to look or quite what to do with the rest of me. I brought a notebook, but my note-taking, to be charitable, sucks. I had trouble focusing on the sentences long enough to get them down. I was grateful we had a camera rolling.

What I shoot for is that state of grace where I’m not really thinking about any of this, where I’m just asking and the other person is just answering. I like to be all antennae when I ask a question; it goes out like a radio transmission, and I sit by the receiver, waiting to get something back. What that something is, I don’t know, and it’s the brief, nervous excitement of waiting, and listening as the question gets parsed and replied to, that I’m there for. That and all the other signals I think I’m getting – is the politician nervous? Is the crowd interested? Who’s smiling, who’s frowning?

Of course, what you usually get back is as predictable as a press release, and you often end up in the unsatisfying business of trying to make small distinctions – You said ‘no’ yesterday and ‘not’ today, and has your position changed? Anyway, neither the candidate nor I had good footing, so nothing much interesting happened, and I walked away no wiser.

The photographer Lee Friedlander was asked once about the act of photographing as art, and he corrected the questioner, said it was more like what an athlete does. You hit a ball or catch one or run fast because you can, because the act and your wiring agree with each other. Asking questions is like that, even though I hate intruding on peoples’ privacy, hate hurting people, hate being difficult or being seen as difficult. Sometimes – more so as I get older – I walk away, but sometimes still I ask and wait, and hope for the blessedly unexpected.

bruce morton: an appreciation

Posted September 7, 2014 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

For a few years back in the 1980s, I wanted nothing more than to be Bruce Morton, the CBS News correspondent who died Friday at the age of 83.

The obituaries online pretty much all describe Morton the way the New York Times does, as an ” a solid reporter of expansive breadth and expertise, with special gifts as a writer.” The last is the important part, because over the years I have come to think of Morton as representing the road-not-taken by TV news, the writerly road, for lack of a better word.

Now “writerly” is not necessarily a good thing, and certainly not a common thing, in TV journalism. As the medium has matured, we’ve learned a lot about what works and what doesn’t, and in general, very plain, functional writing works, but even a little bit of literary flourish does not, especially when you move away from feature pieces and toward hard news. Writing that calls attention to itself is competing against TV’s primary selling points, pictures and sound, and you end up with stories that are more about style than about the subject at hand.

As I remember it, Morton fought this problem to a draw; I paid the most attention to him when he was writing about politics for CBS, and his pieces were deft; you got the point, got that there might be more points worth exploring beyond the horizon of the particular story you were watching and got that there was an intelligence behind the story, that the piece at hand was part of a larger narrative. He was seldom merely clever, though like all writers, he had his off-days.

Two memories:

- I met him once, in New York City, while I was in town working on a story. A guy at the network knew I was a fan and decided to surprise me by introducing him. I’d like to say it was memorable, but I was too flustered and worried about my own story. What I remember most was, he was surprisingly tall.

-  The very best memory I have of Morton is from the CBS News coverage of Tiananmen Square in 1989; Dan Rather was anchoring from there, and CBS had a murder’s row of correspondents on the ground including Morton and Charles Kuralt. While the details have long since faded, there came a point during the coverage where Morton delivered a magnificent “it doesn’t get any better than this” story wrapped live, and then Rather went to Kuralt, who did a piece that, impossible though it seemed to me at the time, was even better. Here were two great reporters, right in the middle of history, who were working at such a high level it was almost like play.

Of course, TV news isn’t built for such things – the Mortons and Kuralts are rare, since writers tend to gravitate to mediums where they can, well, write. And it’s easy to go wrong with writerly TV news; I know, I’ve done enough of it. But Morton reminds us that TV news had the potential to be somewhat different, a little more open to different ways of telling stories.

good enough

Posted July 27, 2014 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

I ended up with a new phone about a month back; I didn’t want one, didn’t want to spend the money and bought on price.

So how is it? Like the headline says, good enough.

Here’s what happened: I was coming in from walking the dogs and somehow – I have no idea how – jammed the on/off switch on my HTC 8x, the stylish Win 8 phone I’ve been carrying for several months. The thing sat in a spare bedroom and buzzed every 30 seconds or so for hours as it cycled between on and off, before the battery finally gave up. It’s a beautifully shaped and styled phone, but there really wasn’t much force involved and the fact that it broke so easily is disappointing.

Anyway, I was now phoneless, so I dug out the HTC Trophy I used a year or so back. It remains a surprisingly competent phone even though it runs the deprecated Win 7; I could get almost every program on it that I could on the 8x, which maybe also says something about how slow progress is on the platform. But I wanted 4G, which meant a new phone was necessary.

Obviously, I could have bought an iPhone or a top line Android phone, but that would have meant either handing Verizon several hundred dollars of my money, or giving Verizon another two year commitment. Since one of my goals is to get all the phones in our family off contract, I did neither.

That left me with three choices: buy a very old iPhone, buy a newer used Android phone or buy another Windows phone. I could have bought an iPhone 4s for roughly $150 on ebay, with no guarantee other than the likelihood that the phone has already seen hard use. Nope. That left Android or more Windows. If I shopped it, I could find a used Moto X for about $200. That’s better, because the Moto X is a very recent phone and got strong reviews, all of which said, basically, “This phone is a bargain, both on price and design.” I was tempted, but again I wasn’t going to get a guarantee, and given the fact that  I’d be gambling that the phone was both in good shape and cleared for use on Verizon’s network, I passed.

So that left buying another Windows phone. Because the platform isn’t very popular, you can get great deals on refurbs and excess new stock. I ended up with a Nokia 822, a phone that’s about a year and a half old, brand new in a Verizon box. The screen took a little getting used to; it’s not nearly as high resolution as the 8x. It’s also boxy and not at all stylish, and it feels ever so slightly loose, like you could rattle it a little. (You can’t.) However, it’s every bit as fast as the 8x and has two things the other phone didn’t – a memory expansion slot and a battery you can replace. Not glamorous, but nice.

Because the screen is wider, and the resolution is lower, everything’s a little bigger, which suits my eyes just fine. Plus, the Nokia is better at making calls – reviewers criticized the audio quality, but the people I call like what they hear from this phone better than the 8x. And because it’s a Nokia, the company (now part of Microsoft) most invested in the Windows phone platform, I have a better chance of getting updates and fixes. (The only problem I’ve had was today, when plugging in headphones, and the right channel wasn’t there. A reboot fixed it.)

And the price? $134 shipped, with guarantee. I avoid extending my Verizon contract, which makes this a very good deal for me. The larger point is – Win phones are the best value out there for ordinary human beings who just want a phone and who can compromise a little on app availability, and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. Microsoft seems committed to the platform – the company just killed what many people believed was a “Plan B” Android phone that substituted Microsoft’s online services for Google’s – but most of the growth is reportedly taking place in low end phones, and in “developing countries,” where cheap tech rules. That means we can expect a few more years of slow growth and bargain prices.

keyboard blues

Posted July 27, 2014 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

I’ve been struggling lately with computers and more specifically, what to do for a laptop. My daily driver is a Win 7 Lenovo T61, and it’s getting old. There’s nothing wrong with it, but the cpu isn’t powerful enough to run some software I want to run, so I’m looking at replacements.

(I don’t buy tech often, and when I do, I buy old/used/refurb and cheap as a rule because nothing devalues faster than a computer/tablet/cell phone.)

First up was a Dell XPS 12, one of those “flip it one way and it’s a laptop, flip it the other it’s a tablet” things. It’s a lovely machine, lightning fast, but the trackpad was not great and the high resolution small screen was just a little too small for me. On top of that, the flip function…didn’t. The physical part works fine, but if I wanted to use the computer in what I think of as “stand mode,” I would have to manually adjust the software so it’s right side up. So the XPS went back.

Now I’m trying another Dell, a 7000 series, 14 inch machine. It has decent specs; an i5 chip, six gigs of memory, a 500 gig hard drive. The screen is a little dim, but I can live with that, and the battery life is tremendous. However, the keyboard is a deal breaker; it’s chiclet style, which is bad enough, but far worse is the action – writing this note has been an exercise in frustration. Almost every sentence has one, and often more than one, word with extra letters or skipped letters. Also, the track pad – which was supposed to be a highlight of this machine – isn’t good. The “track” part is fine, but the click function is terrible; you really have to bear down, and even when you do, it’s hard to tell the click was successful. One of the most common tasks, left clicking on the track pad and holding it down while swiping through copy, is far more difficult than it should be.

Laptop manufacturers appear to regard good keyboards and track pads as premium items. I spent 20 minutes in a store Saturday trying out various machines, and none of them were very good at the most basic distinction between laptops and tablets, the ability to type a lot, easily. That includes cheaper Lenovos – the decent keyboards seemed to be reserved for $1,000+ models. What this means is – I’m going to have to buy T series Lenovos (or maybe Dell Latitudes) going forward, which also means either spending more than I want to, or buying older machines than I want to. I really hate spending money on technology.

(My Lenovo’s keyboard and track pad is so far better than anything else I’ve tried as to be in a completely separate league. My experience with Latitude keyboards/track pads is they’re good enough.)

All that said, Dell’s Chromebook is great value for the money. I’m using the four gig version and even though the 11.6 inch screen is a little small for my 58 year old eyes, as a content consumption device it beats tablets in most respects, though I’m disappointed I can’t listen to Audible titles because the cloud player requires a Silverlight plug-in, unsupported in ChromeOS. And no small irony, it’s a lot better machine for typing as well.

 

pleasures of the pod

Posted July 2, 2014 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

Here’s what I missed about podcasting, what I thought was a weakness – or at least I had trouble getting used to it – and now understand it as podcasting’s chief strength: it meanders.

This is no news at all to the millions of people who listen to podcasts already, but it is to me, who loved the idea of podcasting from the start but was annoyed by the implementation, the way people just, ummm, talked to each other.

My background in broadcasting doesn’t help, especially because I’m a product of commercial tv news where you don’t use many words, so everything has to count. You’re very goal-oriented. So 45 minutes of drifting in and out of a topic struck me as grossly inefficient and boring.

What I missed was the way a good podcast mirrors a good conversation in the real world, how you turn over an idea or an item from the news or you-name-it from a bunch of different angles. I find myself absorbing more about a given topic and, I think, getting a fairer take on the matter at hand.

A good podcast isn’t seat-of-the-pants of course; there’s preparation in the background. Windows Weekly, a favorite, alludes to the show notes, which get passed around in advance among the three hosts. It’s their ability to animate those notes, to digress from and return to them, which makes the show work.

I also like podcasts which are repurposed from radio – like the Fresh Air and Radiolab shows – but they don’t strike me as the main event. I know, I know – I’m laughably late to the party, but I tend to be this way about tech. I didn’t care about Twitter until I understood it as a highly personal wire service. I still don’t care about Facebook much because  I don’t value what it does best, work at the personal level.

I have yet to find the ideal podcast client; I finally understand Stitcher, and like it better than anything else, but it doesn’t let me download shows for offline listening and has some gaps which suprise me – Dave Douglas’s A Noise From The Deep isn’t on there, and neither is The Committed podcast with Kirk McIlhearn. So I’m using Stitcher, TuneIn Radio (I hate the new interface though) and Podcasts! on my Windows 8 phone.

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.