street seen

Posted May 20, 2013 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

A woman, between 35 and 45, in pink sweat pants and flip flops, crossing the street to lean into the open window of a car.

She is blonde, densely fat, and her skin looks like it was chemically darkened and then left out in the sun for good measure. She is wearing angry pink lipstick and her mouth is a straight line across, unsmiling. She’s the woman who holds the money, the money you will never see again, at a card game. Her breasts head straight down.

She is wearing a wife beater tee shirt. Across the front it reads “Gorgeous.”

 

a note on my mother

Posted May 14, 2013 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

My mother died Monday, May 13, after a long time in a nursing home. She was 93.

The brief obituary I wrote stayed close to the bare facts – date of birth, marriage, a little about where she and my father lived over the years. Call it occupational wariness: in my professional life I deal with a lot of obituaries and I have read too many that strain, and fail, to capture the story of a life lived.

So this note is not that; it is only a slice of her life. Granted, the one I think that defined her, but still only a slice.

It’s clear to me that my mother suffered from depression. In the end, the depression won. But she should be remembered for having fought a long campaign to cope with an illness that wasn’t understood at all back when she was a child and young adult, and only understood marginally better as she got older.

Where’s the proof? Well, for one, her own mother was *sickly* from a young age (sometime after having had my mother and her sisters) and often *took to her bed,* as my mother would put it. I was of course too young, and saw her too infrequently to know first hand, but my recollection is that grandmother suffered from a nebulous set of symptoms, the sort of vague unwellness that depression can bring.

As well, my mother’s oldest sister drank, had relationship problems and ended her life living quietly in a shabby motel. To my mother, my aunt was a morality play – Look, see what can happen to you if you’re not vigilant! – but you could just as well explain my aunt as someone who was struggling with depression.

Finally, and most of all, there was my mom herself. She married my dad, who came from an abusive family, and they both came of age in the fearsome years of the Great Depression. So the fear of not having enough was the tent pole of her personality; some of my first memories are of being warned about spending money. (As a five year old, it frightened and saddened me.) That fear led her to be beyond diligent; she’s the reason my parents got through some tough times and had enough to retire on. But the price she paid was very high, as she maintained a constant watch against adverse financial weather.

In this, she was no different than other children of the Depression; what distinguished my mom was how at war with itself  her world view was. It’s what got her out of bed in the morning, gave her a way to navigate the day. On the one hand, she believed that life is hard, that fate is unkind and that you are entirely your own doing. That was half the emotional sense of it, but because my mother was bright, she also understood intellectually that the world was more complicated than that. And because she felt failure deep in her bones, my mother was also very compassionate at times – in the 1970s, she worked for a mental health agency helping to run a “halfway house,” and understood full well that many of the women she had under her wing were the victims of circumstance.

Faced with these two contradictory impulses, my mom (and by extension my dad) retreated into a measured life lived almost entirely with and for each other; they talked out everything, proceeded cautiously and – when something hit a rough patch – they would simply withdraw. I know of one couple my parents were friends with that they simply stopped talking to for 25 years; there were never any angry words exchanged, and when the ice broke, they just resumed the friendship, with no acknowledgement of what had happened.

If what I’m describing sounds terrible, it wasn’t, not most of the time, day in and out. As long as you stayed focused on the here and now, things were pretty good. There was laughter, and community, though my parents managed to move often enough that I’m not sure they could ever claim anyone as a life long friend, an aunt and uncle excepted. And my mom knew enough to try to raise me lightly; I think she understood her deepest leanings were dangerous, so we sang silly songs, dyed Easter eggs, had great birthday parties and Christmases. She loved me fiercely, even if that love could not escape the gravitational pull of life’s disappointments. When my mom lifted her eyes up to the horizon, considered the longer view, the depression would come rushing back in.

So much of this was not obvious to me until the long, sad decline of her last decade. Without my dad, who suffered from Alzheimer’s Disease, and with neither abiding faith nor great curiosity about the world, she had nothing to build a life on. Living alone in a house they had foolishly bought when they moved back north, she was easy prey to the sadness she had held at bay for decades. She would sit in a chair by the hour, clipping self help articles from the local newspaper or a magazine. She couldn’t bring herself to visit the church down the street, though she and my father had belonged to it, been active in it decades before. She was uncomfortable when people came around, when friends or friends of friends tried to visit. She lost the fundamentals of how to make sense out of a life. I was no help then, less help later.

In her last days, whatever was left of her struggled to breathe, to move, for the meat machine to keep going, but those stretches would be leavened by moments when I would stroke her hair or her forehead and she would quiet for a moment. At one point, after I thought any real awareness had fled, she reached out to me with her shriveled up hand, ran that hand across my hair, over and over, and stared at me, eyes wide. It strikes me now that my mom, if she had been sitting next to me watching all this unfold, might have said “Look, I was right. Life is hard…right up to the end.” And then she would have given me a hug.

odds n’ sods

Posted April 21, 2013 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

Leave it to my son to come up with a devastating name for the dominant style of reporting on cable news channels. It’s horrifying and perfect: “big box journalism.”

From the Volokh Conspiracy, a concise primer on everything you don’t know about the Miranda warning. Context: the government’s decision to question the surviving Boston Marathon (alleged) bomber without reading him his Miranda rights.

By way of The Dish, a Scientific American article on the pitfalls of e-reading. I’ve switched to reading as little as I can on paper, and can attest that etext is not a perfect replacement. As the article suggests, it’s best for things you want to read straight through, like a novel. It’s weakest at things that rely on serendipity, like a favorite book of mine, The Penguin Jazz Guide: The History of The Music In The 1001 Best Albums. The book is arranged chronologically, but you don’t get enough of a clue about where you are on the timeline by moving the scroll bar. You have to move and then look as two separate acts, (and depending on the size of the machine you’re reading on, you may have to jump ahead or back a few pages to be sure).

Contrast that to a paper book, in which opening it is just about the same thing as looking. Browsing is more seamless.

Speaking of jazz and serendipity, at the used record store in Syracuse Saturday,  a pristine copy of Lady Day: The Complete Billie Holiday On Columbia 1933-1944  for $19.95. Given that the cheapest you can find it used on Amazon is close to $40, this was a great price. With store credit, I paid a little under $9. This is the set of 2001 remasters from which the two cd set I wrote about here is derived, and which I fully expect to listen to with devotion for the rest of my life.

     

cnn gets it wrong (again)

Posted April 18, 2013 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

Give John King this: at least he went on Anderson Cooper’s show at 8 Wednesday night and acknowledged he’s ‘responsible’ for what he says on tv, and that some ‘misreporting’ occurred earlier in the day, regarding the investigation into the Boston bombing.

As far as I can tell, King’s statement is the closest CNN came to admitting what was painfully obvious to anyone watching: in the middle of a big, breaking story, CNN had gotten it really, really wrong.

To be exact, Wednesday afternoon King and CNN consultant/talking head Fran Townsend each said they had sources independent of the other confirming that an arrest had been made. King had earlier broken the story that investigators were making significant progress, and maybe it seemed plausible to whoever oversees these things at CNN that “significant progress” – in this case, video of a person from the area where the second bomb went off – could lead to an almost instant arrest. But it wasn’t, really: in order to believe an arrest had been made, you’d have to believe the video footage gave authorities such a good image that they were able to identify the person, and that the person was somehow known to them, and that the person – who had just helped commit an act of terrorism – hadn’t thought to, I don’t know, move and leave no forwarding address.

Sure, it could happen. But what are the odds?

As bad as that is, CNN’s behavior from about 2:30 on was worse. The network was forced to walk back the story as denials began to pour in from various federal and local law enforcement types, but unless I missed it, CNN never even came close to saying ‘We got it wrong.’ As soon as the story had been shot down, it became ‘miscommunication’ in which ‘several news organizations’ were involved. A CNN spokesperson issued a statement at some point to the effect of ‘We had three sources telling us this was the case. When we got different information, our story changed.’

Or as King said on Anderson Cooper’s show, ‘You’re only as good as your sources.’ Which is exactly the same excuse Judith Miller used for the misleading articles the New York Times published that helped make the case for the Iraq war, and which reporters everywhere have used forever to justify stories that are deeply misguided. Thing is though, it’s not true. You’re only as good as your sources plus your own ability to independently evaluate the information you’re being given. The first question a good reporter asks, especially when handed a big piece of news, is ‘Does this pass the smell test?’

But just as a thought experiment, let’s say King is right and a reporter really is only as good as his sources. Remember, the true story – that investigators are making progress, have a video of someone but have not made an arrest or, likely, even a good i.d. – never changed Wednesday afternoon. The only thing that changed was CNN’s understanding of the facts. Pete Williams at NBC got it right to start and never wavered; his sources told him no arrest had been made. So if CNN is only as good as its sources, well…you can draw your own conclusions.

CNN wasn’t alone Wednesday afternoon; Fox popped up a few minutes after CNN broke the story of the ‘arrest’ to report that Fox had ‘confirmed’ an arrest was made. My guess is CNN went with King and Townsend because one of the network’s few remaining strengths is in breaking news, and reporters and producers feel tremendous pressure to win on days like Wednesday. I suspect Fox still has some kind of vestigial fear of CNN, even after all these years of Fox being number one in cable news, and as such never wants to fall too far behind. The two insecurities, taken together, are a bad combination – we saw it at the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare last summer, when CNN and Fox rushed to report the court had struck down health care reform. They were of course wrong and Pete Williams, God bless him, was one of the reporters who got it right. A commenter in my Twitter feed yesterday noted that Williams is carving out a niche as the unofficial CNN corrector; next time there’s a big break, either on Boston or some other national story, I’ll still watch CNN, but then I’ll flip over to make sure Pete Williams agrees.

one step up and two steps back

Posted March 20, 2013 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

There is no getting around, through or by the “looming debt is a disaster” crowd without tying yourself in knots.

“Morning Joe,” which has become a parody of informed political conversation, now calls Krugman et al “debt deniers,” as if giving them a name that sounds vaguely like climate change denial or anti-evolutionists removes the need to pay serious attention to his/their arguments, (“Oh, that’s just crazy Paul Krugman. You know how he is.”) when in fact the science and results are on Krugman’s side.

At the same time, CNN east coast 7 pm anchor Erin Burnett, after literally years of coddling the debt-is-destroying-us crowd, just offhandedly lobs into a debrief earlier this week that ‘debt isn’t an immediate problem’ and that the markets are proof of that. Which is exactly what Krugman has been shouting for several years now, to little avail until recently. Maybe she figures that if she just treats it as something everyone knows, no one will notice the last few years’ sad performance.

Finally, the man himself, reminding us of what people thought back in the 30s. Some things never change.

double secret

Posted February 28, 2013 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

A district attorney I used to cover would punish reporters who wrote tough stories about him by putting them on something called “double-secret probation,” the idea being that your sources would dry up, your calls wouldn’t get returned and you wouldn’t even know why.

That same sort of absurdity is at work in this week’s Supreme Court ruling that reporters and others don’t have legal “standing” to challenge the government’s habit of secretly wiretapping Americans without a warrant. The reasoning of the majority is that journos don’t have standing because, ummm, they can’t prove that their communications are targeted, which they can’t because who is targeted is….a secret.

Or as the headline on this note neatly puts it, “Secret Wiretapping Cannot Be Challenged Because It’s Secret.” In other words, if the government is good enough at keeping its secrets, you’ll never know you were targeted, so you’ll never know enough to have “standing,” or at least not until life-altering damage is done.  It’s double-secret probation, except the stakes are so much higher than not getting a call returned. The Obama administration has shown great enthusiasm for pursuing people who leak information, and this week’s ruling will make already reluctant sources more reluctant still.

a modest proposal

Posted February 28, 2013 by collectedobsessions
Categories: Uncategorized

Baldur Bjarnason weighs in on what Barnes & Noble should do. It’s not what you’d expect, which is not to say it’s wrong.

He proposes the company get out of the hardware (Nook tablet) business and even dump its own in-house ereading app.

So, my suggestion would be to scrap the reading app and just license someone else’s. Bluefire Reader is a decent, well-made app and seems to be the current safe bet. A slightly more off the wall bet would be to do some sort of deal with Readmill. Or, if B&N can talk publishers off the DRM ledge and onto the watermarking perch, they could just switch to using iBooks when on iOS and have a book delivery app that doesn’t do anything but notify people when new books are ready to be copied into iBooks. Going the watermarking route would also enable readers to just use their favourite app for everything.

He doesn’t emphasize it, but the big win here for B & N would be getting rid of DRM. As noted earlier, one of the things that stops readers like me from buying from B & N is fear that the company will go under and I will no longer have access to my books. Get rid of DRM and that issue goes away. If B & N led the pack on this, I would be willing to pay a small premium per book, and my loyalties would shift slightly, at least for a while.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.